Hush. I think girls have it much tougher than boys, and whatever you say, we still get 70 cents to your dollar, gentlemen. However, finance is the one realm where there is an unfair double standard for men. A guy friend recently suggested that girls look for the three 6's in the opposite sex: 6 feet, 6-figure salary, and as I am a lady, the last six will be left to your imagination.
You will notice that only one of those factors can actually be changed, one's salary. I feel that whenever girls start talking about the opposite sex, "Can he provide for you?" is the question that inevitably pops up. I think I speak for all of us when I say, we can provide for ourselves. Then what makes a guy being established so important and attractive?
We can turn to Jane Austen: "It is a truth universally acknowledged, that a single man in possession of a good fortune, must be in want of a wife."
We can turn to T.I. in "Whatever You Like": "You want it, I got it, go get it, I buy it / Tell them other broke joker, 'be quiet.' "
We can turn to TLC: "Want to get with me with no money? / Oh no, I don't want no scrub."
So what is going on here? I would hope that the idea of the man being the sole breadwinner of the family is outdated and has been proven wrong countless times. Yet again and again, I hear my friends say, "He has a terrible job; he's going nowhere fast," and the like. My best friend's mother has a whole theory on dating pools, where she insists we "study" at the law school library or, if worse comes to worse, the business school library dressed to impress (I brought this up to my mom to say it's ridiculous, but she agreed! Woe to the cosmetic nature of the off-the-boat Russian culture).
Gentlemen, do you feel you become more attractive if you make a lucrative living, whether or not you like your job? Ladies, do you really go by the three 6s? What's going on here?
Chatboard (0)